google.com, pub-9442811071336901, DIRECT, f08c47fec0942fa0

LIVE: Boyfriend Cop Murder Trial – MA v. Karen Read – Day 25

Karen Read is accused of driving drunk and hitting her boyfriend, Boston police officer John O’Keefe, before leaving him to die in January 2022. Read is now facing several charges, including second-degree murder for the death of O’Keefe. Read claims that she is the victim of a massive frame-up by state and local police.

If you experienced adverse side effects after taking Ozempic or another weight loss medication, check your eligibility to file a claim by visiting https://www.glp1case.com/lclive?v=olcl11

Subscribe to Law&Crime Network: https://bit.ly/LawAndCrimeNetwork

STAY UP-TO-DATE WITH THE LAW&CRIME NETWORK:
Watch Law&Crime Network on YouTubeTV: https://bit.ly/3td2e3y
Where To Watch Law&Crime Network: https://bit.ly/3akxLK5
Sign Up For Law&Crime’s Daily Newsletter: https://bit.ly/LawandCrimeNewsletter
Read Fascinating Articles From Law&Crime Network: https://bit.ly/3td2Iqo

For Advertising Inquiries, Please Contact: sales@lawandcrime.com
For Licensing Inquiries, Please Contact: licensing@lawandcrime.com

LAW&CRIME NETWORK SOCIAL MEDIA:
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/lawandcrime/
Twitter: https://twitter.com/LawCrimeNetwork
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/lawandcrime
Twitch: https://www.twitch.tv/lawandcrimenetwork
TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@lawandcrime

LAW&CRIME NETWORK PODCASTS: https://lawandcrime.com/podcasts/

SUBSCRIBE TO ALL OF LAW&CRIME NETWORK YOUTUBE CHANNELS:
Main Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCz8K1occVvDTYDfFo7N5EZw
Law&Crime Shorts: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCVXOqoOCYbi-iXChKAl6DTQ
Channel B: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXCLaaClAWQiTkl3pw9ZdLw
Channel C: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCMV3pzWIhJGLYzoHyxBjjNw

Visit YouTube Channel

47 thoughts on “LIVE: Boyfriend Cop Murder Trial – MA v. Karen Read – Day 25

  1. Right at the end, Jackson has some great points. I would also have asked if there was any testing done with temperature variations on a low speed bump between the metal of an SUV outside with snow stuck to it and the plastic tail light lens coming from inside a garage that may very well be heated? i also saw the snow move this time. It slipped down slightly on the rear windshield.

  2. They made it a point that it was snowing so how could his head hit the pavement? Especially when a plow never went by? And where's all this compelling evidence against her. All i saw was the picture of the Albert house, a few videos and some charts. I've heard a lot of lies and witnesses contradicting other witnesses stories.. i see a lot of reasonable doubt. Prosecution is gonna have to do a lot better then this in my opinion. I may of missed it, but they didnt keep showing John's body and injuries. His body should tell them exactly what happened. For those of you have never seen a ufc fight, go look at a couple of them when they're done and go look at people who were hit by cars and explain his eye injury to me that actually makes sense

  3. I wish I started counting how many times these so called witnesses/liars say the word "umm" while their talking. Some of the witnesses that have no reason to lie, haven't said it once

  4. @06:05:00 Her suv did jerk to driver side, contrary to direction & momentum when backing up. Trooper being dishonest about crash contact damages on one vehicle or other. And personal experience- on I395, rearended by suv who stopped too late, and slammed 10 feet forward into sedan in front of me. The SUV and car were towed/totaled. My 1978 Jimmy (just repainted, new chrome, etc) thatf sustained NO damage. I miss my Jimmy…

  5. Just when I was starting to feel productive in life, this witness lists her super impressive resume…veteran, electrical engineer, graduate level adjunct professor, terrorist fighter, publisher, academic peer reviewer, entrepreneur, expert witness, association president, volunteer, author, and editor. Wow!

  6. Karen looks absolutely bored. The jury will see this which I'm happy about. I live in Canada and only following facts and evidence. I don't know either party. Karen should have plead guilty to Involuntary Manslaughter instead of putting John's family thru this circus of a trial. Justice will prevail as it did in the Murdaugh trial. He had a high power legal team too and look where he is now.

  7. 27 people took the test, & ONLY 3 PASSED?!!?? I'm not an expert for n this area, but I'm thinking, maybe we should increase qualifications for TEACHING, that course!!..🤷🏻‍♀️

  8. Read is scared to death about him plugging that machine in under her dash, because it will download sudden stop and things attributed to accidents. She looked like she wanted to die when they went to lunch, I thought she was going to cry when she looked at her family.

  9. ASIDE FROM THE ACTUAL DETAILS OF THE TRIAL , IT'S QUITE OBVIOUS THAT GIVEN THE ACCOUSTICS OF THE COURTROOM , THAT THERE IS A MAJOR DEFICIENCY IN THE SOUND SYSTEM IN THE ROOM . TOO MANY ANNOYING REQUESTS TO HAVE PEOPLE SPEAK UP . BETTER MICROPHONES , BETTER SPEAKERS AND A QUIETER FAN ARE NEEDED !

  10. She probably did accidentally hit him, but they didn’t investigate other highly probable theories. Had they done that (in a professional manner at least as well) it would be much easier to conclude guilt. But they didn’t, and so it would be very difficult if I was a juror to conclude guilt beyond reasonable doubt. There’s too much doubt. Sad, because they could have eliminated that doubt by investigating other very reasonable theories.

  11. It amazes me how many people leach on to the conspiracy theories! They must be the same ones that think 911 and Sandy Hook were a hoax. Huge difference between a department doing “a better job” and a department and many many other agencies getting together to collaborate!!

  12. I'm from Boston. Taxpayers are paying for this LONG trial because there are too many days off, etc. I don't know if Karen is guilty or not. I suspect she will be found not guilty or it will be a hung jury.

  13. Hello? Do you hear me now? Ya'll in chat and anybody else (this crazy wacky defense attorney) trying to defend this woman are fools! Ya'll can't see the forest for the trees!!! All this defense lawyer is doing is attacking the PROFESSIONAL on his PROFESSIONAL OPINION, not the evidence or what is fact. This computer software doesn't lie, you can't program it that way, etc. Come on people, jeez. It is just amazing how people are blind and oblivious to the truth about things.

  14. She has said many times she was so drunk couldn't remember anything from thst night then turns around says she did hit him then once again turns around said she was the only one trying to save him. She's guilty.

  15. On the library video, there was barely any snow. Did Higgins plow the gravel in the driveway then? Also, Officer O'Keefe was found on a thick layer of snow, refer to the leaf blower video with blood in the snow and broken glass. No red pieces of tail light in this video…

  16. I love how Karen's vanity car betrayed her! (Also, I didn't realize the extent our cars are data logging us) and also that the defense hanging their hat on "Jenn made 2AM Google Searches" got dismantled.

    If you're on a jury having to suffer through weeks and weeks of the world's most boring drinking party because the defense wanted to cook up a massive conspiracy, only for the "evidence" to crumble as time goes on, then the defense's credibility sinks more and more, because their "reasonable doubt" is an irrational delusion.

  17. I find it hard to believe that a cop living in a million-dollar house has NO SECURITY CAMERAS!! What happened to those cameras and the videos? Or did they not want cameras around that might reveal illicit activities.
    Yahoo News: "The documents list dozens of items of evidence the prosecution has turned over – including text messages between O’Keefe and a Canton police detective. The filing doesn’t reveal what the texts say. O’Keefe reported concerns about drug activity to Canton detectives before his death."

  18. This crash reconstruction guy is a straight up liar, he mumbles and every time he’s not sure, lies or gets nervous he goes to touch his neck or face. He’s an absolute joke of an excuse for a wanna be big guy who wants a Pat on the back from his liar cop buddies

  19. The data shows that the first event happened 842 seconds after the car was started. That is consistent with starting the car and letting it warm up in the parking lot of the Waterfall an then backing from a parking space. There is NOTHING that places the car at 34 Fairview when the "events" occurred. A bunch of BUNK!

    He also claims that JO was hit with the back corner of the vehicle at over 20 mph. Where's the bruises? Being hit by a Lexus SUV at more than 20 mph would cause bruising the length of the body from the knees to the shoulder-not dog bite type scratches on only the forearm!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *