google.com, pub-9442811071336901, DIRECT, f08c47fec0942fa0

Karen Read Calls Out Prosecution | Killer or Cover-up Murder Trial Day 21 Recap

Was video deleted from Officer John O’Keefe’s ring camera? #KarenRead’s defense team noticed video evidence of Read’s Lexus shown to the jury was inverted and possibly edited.

#CourtTV – What do YOU think?

Watch 24/7 Court TV LIVE Stream Today https://www.courttv.com/
Join the Investigation Newsletter https://www.courttv.com/email/
Court TV Podcast https://www.courttv.com/podcast/

Join the Court TV Community to get access to perks:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCo5E9pEhK_9kWG7-5HHcyRg/join

FOLLOW THE CASE:
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/courttv
Twitter/X https://twitter.com/CourtTV
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/courttvnetwork/
TikTok https://www.tiktok.com/@courttvlive
YouTube https://www.youtube.com/c/COURTTV

WATCH +140 FREE TRIALS IN THE COURT TV ARCHIVE 
https://www.courttv.com/trials/
HOW TO FIND COURT TV 
https://www.courttv.com/where-to-watch/

Visit YouTube Channel

50 thoughts on “Karen Read Calls Out Prosecution | Killer or Cover-up Murder Trial Day 21 Recap

  1. None of this clearly manipulated evidence should be allowed in round two period! They need to preserve all this and talk to the IT people in Canton and demand them show what exactly they have and a copy to forensically annalize.

    They should talk to the tow driver because

    Yuri is the person driving the car into the Sally Port.

    It had already been in the garage.

    The snow makes a square exactly Lexus shaped.

    They arived much earlier!

  2. So, The taillight prosecution wanted us to believe was shattered in the video was the one inverted? Right? Damn, I wish prosecutors & witness tried to convince jury it was clearly shattered/broken in that video THEN tried to explain that testimony away when the defense showed the proper video with the completely intact driver side taillight there. I mean, THAT would be just another slam dunk!

    You hear what I’m saying? The inverted & timestamp re-placement was enough, but man if prosecution focused on the “apparent” damage to that “passenger side” taillight… oof … how would you come back from that?!

    Karen Read- you are NOT GUILTY and my condolences to you for the loss of your love, John. ❤

  3. Police and the legal system, fabricating evidence and withholding evidence in the UK and USA and probably world wide, NEVER !
    sarcasm.
    Until they are arrested and jailed for the above it will continue.
    But that rarely happens.

  4. This joker is saying "security cameras invert their images to enhance the field of vision and remove blind spots." Wonder who paid him to say that because there is no truth in it. Can any idiot come on this show? And none of the others call him out, don't they understand this obvious lie either?

    Also I think it's ironic or something that he is talking about someone else not being knowingly deceptive while being knowingly deceptive.

  5. Just another point, just another piece of evidence getting blown away!! A good example of the phrase the blind leading the blind😅😂😮

  6. Okay Nick Rocco😅 so now that they blew away the conspiracy theory and about the McCabe's search on Google now what you got to say, better take a couple deep breaths and loosen up that tie a little bit,😊 your conspiracy theory is going down as fast as your hairline is going up😅😂😢😮

  7. They knew exactly what they were doing, the time stamp would have to have been doctured sense the video was mirrored.

    They never went into the house which should have been a crime scene, then got rid of the dog AND the house so quickits insane.
    Reasonal doubt 100%
    And the snow plower didnt even see anything and that would be impossible not to see him there.
    Then dont forget those serches of how long does it take for someone to die in the col basically.
    Sketch Sketch Sketch

  8. LOVE your opening monologue Vinnie! 🙌🏼 Perfectly stated! That’s exactly how it’s supposed to be and should be. The truth. The facts. Nothing more!

    Thank you for saying it and thank you for your excellent and fair coverage of this case. I have really enjoyed watching your “Closing Arguments” and I’m grateful that this case brought your program to my attention. I will be following and watching for a long time to come.

  9. Read should have started crying at Proctors text messages about her "leaking poo" and "whack job" etc rather than glaring at him. She did seem to have teary eyes…she should have let it rip, sobbing, sniffling, etc. That's how I would have felt hearing a police officer text like that about me. I'd be crying and shaking my head like: "See? They already had it in for me."

  10. @34:20 in real life or as it's depicted…😮all evidence should be accurately depicted real life in a trial. This investigator just validates that this evidence isn't an accurate depiction of real life events that the prosecution is using to try and convict a woman of murder. What are they going to do in other cases, super impose a gun in someone's hand and submit it as evidence? I'll term you what if i was a defense attorney for a previously convicted person, I'd be bringing the conviction into question if this was the prosecutor for the case and video evidence was submitted. Defense attorneys are being handed overturned cases based on a lot of things being brought up in this case. The prosecution is making video evidence questionable, electronic evidence questionable, witness testimony questionable, dna evidence questionable… then there is the integrity of investigators, prosecutors, and the judge, that could be argued to overturn convictions. I see a lot of monsters going free over the issues with this case.

  11. Vinnie, Lally is definitely trying to run out the clock here and rope a dope the jury so they'll cut to the chase and convict her of SOMETHING just to get out of there and not think about it.
    I know that because this Monday morning the judge whined that she told the jury that they would get the case at the end of the month by way of arguing with the defense about having experts testify about the arm marks being dog bites (which is exactly what they look like, btw…). She kept cutting off Yanetti and groaning and asking how long it would take!!!!
    APPEAL GROUNDS.

  12. It is so scary to think police officers abuse their profession like this! How many innocent people are in jail now because some police officer and his cop buddies got together to rub their dirty mits together

  13. My Alan Jackson direct quote got removed for community guidelines violation. Looks like I need to report the video for violating the same thing 😂 😆

  14. police cctv cameras are not motion detected, police cctv security cameras are always on on constant recording and the camera is hard wired to the police station server connected to a backup power system to prevent internet cuts, glitches, and missing footage .

  15. 29:47 The man said that the police had debrie at the alberts house where police was searchng with the leaf blower, but the police didnt find anything on the road only a black straw !! And yunis testified that all the large red pieces and any pieces of the tail light was found on the alberts lawn in a 30 yard radius. That man is corrupt alond with kevin.

  16. ?? JEN MCCABE THE GO BETWEEN WRT KAREN AND BRIAN H?? DID SHE LURE KAREN AND JOHN TO THE HOUSE SO BH CLD SEE HER ..REMEMBER SHE ALSO SAID TO K COME WITH ME TO WATERFALL AND SHE WAS THE ONE GETTING JOK TO THEIR HOUSE . ???

  17. None of the taillight pieces found on January 29 were part of Karen’s taillight. The taillight was reconstructed by the crime lab using only pieces recovered after February 2.

    So the time her SUV arrived in the sally port is irrelevant.

  18. It was inverted on purpose, what are you talking about, why saying you don’t know if the defense clearly says that, it was done on purpose since a few things where edited to look like it wasn’t inverted, this thing is obviously a cover up

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *